Archives
Archives
| From: | Walter Dnes <waltdnes@××××××××.org> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-user@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-user] IPTABLES syntax change? | ||
| Date: | Sat, 29 Dec 2012 18:34:10 | ||
| Message-Id: | 20121229183221.GA6975@waltdnes.org | ||
| In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-user] IPTABLES syntax change? by Kerin Millar |
||
| 1 | Two questions I'm not sure about. |
| 2 | |
| 3 | 1) I run a desktop, and use passive ftp. Is there any need for me to |
| 4 | accept RELATED packets? |
| 5 | |
| 6 | 2) Does a "-j LOG" return to the chain it was called from, or does it do |
| 7 | an implicit DROP? |
| 8 | |
| 9 | -- |
| 10 | Walter Dnes <waltdnes@××××××××.org> |
| 11 | I don't run "desktop environments"; I run useful applications |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| Re: [gentoo-user] IPTABLES syntax change? | Jarry <mr.jarry@×××××.com> |
| Re: [gentoo-user] IPTABLES syntax change? | Michael Orlitzky <michael@××××××××.com> |