From: | Neil Bothwick <neil@××××××××××.uk> | ||
---|---|---|---|
To: | gentoo-user@l.g.o | ||
Subject: | Re: [gentoo-user] [Way OT] Kernel Symlink use or not use? | ||
Date: | Fri, 23 Mar 2007 14:26:45 | ||
Message-Id: | 20070323142100.7c9ab116@hactar.digimed.co.uk | ||
In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-user] [Way OT] Kernel Symlink use or not use? by Alan McKinnon |
1 | On Fri, 23 Mar 2007 15:24:38 +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote: |
2 | |
3 | > Ah, my bad. You are right, of course. |
4 | |
5 | What I neglected to mention was that the main point of your post was |
6 | absolutely correct. There is no conflict between the Gentoo and LFS |
7 | documentation, both are correct when used in the only place they apply. |
8 | |
9 | |
10 | -- |
11 | Neil Bothwick |
12 | |
13 | ... We are Dyslexics of Borg. Your ass will be laminated. |
File name | MIME type |
---|---|
signature.asc | application/pgp-signature |