| 1 |
On 2013-09-17 11:18 AM, Michael Orlitzky <michael@××××××××.com> wrote: |
| 2 |
> Any controller that claims RAID10 on a server with 6 drive bays should |
| 3 |
> be able to put all six drives in an array. But you'll get a three-way |
| 4 |
> stripe (better performance) instead of a three-way mirror (better fault |
| 5 |
> tolerance). |
| 6 |
> |
| 7 |
> So, |
| 8 |
> |
| 9 |
> A B C |
| 10 |
> A B C |
| 11 |
> |
| 12 |
> and not, |
| 13 |
> |
| 14 |
> A B |
| 15 |
> A B |
| 16 |
> A B |
| 17 |
> |
| 18 |
> The former gives you more space but slightly less fault tolerance than |
| 19 |
> four drives with a hot spare. |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
Sorry, don't understand what you're saying. |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
Are you talking about the difference between RAID1+0 and RAID0+1? |
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
If not, then please point to *authoritative* docs on what you mean. |
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
Googling on just RAID10 doesn't confuse the issues like you seem to be |
| 28 |
doing (probably my ignorance though)... |
Archives