| 1 |
On Wed, 14 May 2014 10:54:35 +0200, Stefan G. Weichinger wrote: |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
> > No, because each element of the RAID is encrypted separately, so |
| 4 |
> > btrfs can still use the good one to repair the bad one. If you were |
| 5 |
> > to create an mdadm array, put dm-crypt on that and then btrfs on |
| 6 |
> > top, which is more efficient because it encrypts each byte only |
| 7 |
> > once, then you would lose the check and repair facilities. |
| 8 |
> |
| 9 |
> What RAID? I think of a laptop with only one SSD inside. You mean the |
| 10 |
> duplicated metadata in this case? |
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
Ah right. I've got RAID n the brain because I'm currently resizing the |
| 13 |
partitions for a ZFS RAID so I can try out btrfs... and it's all your |
| 14 |
fault for starting this thread and piquing my interest in btrfs again! |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
-- |
| 18 |
Neil Bothwick |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
Secret hacker rule #11: hackers read manuals. |
Archives