Gentoo Archives: gentoo-user

From: Iain Buchanan <iaindb@××××××××××××.au>
To: gentoo-user@l.g.o
Subject: [gentoo-user] [smp related] 2.6.13 is 10x slower than 2.6.12!
Date: Tue, 04 Oct 2005 01:02:07
Message-Id: 1128387470.12718.3.camel@orpheus
In Reply to: [gentoo-user] 2.6.13 is 10x slower than 2.6.12! by Iain Buchanan
1 Not long ago, I griped about 2.6.13 being _very_ slow to boot and run.
2 My original email is at the bottom.
3
4 I've since recompiled the kernel without SMP and Hyperthreading, and the
5 system is _much_ faster.
6
7 So, there is a problem with 2.6.13 and SMP or Hyperthreaded machines.
8 Can anyone else confirm this? What should I do? Is there a kernel.org
9 bugzilla? Or perhaps I should put it in the gentoo bugzilla?
10
11 Any pointers would be appreciated...
12
13 thanks.
14
15 On Tue, 2005-09-27 at 12:11 +0930, Iain Buchanan wrote:
16 > I just compiled 2.6.13-gentoo-r2 with mostly the same options as
17 > 2.6.12-gentoo-r7 (my reference point). The first time I booted, it took
18 > about 10-15 minutes on my 3GHz P4 laptop! I watched the gdm background
19 > slowly display over about 30 seconds.
20 >
21 > I thought it might have something to do with the new default timer
22 > frequency, which I set to 250Hz instead of 1000Hz (which is the default
23 > for pre 2.6.13 kernels). According to various online sites, 250Hz
24 > should still be just as usable, and may even use less power, increasing
25 > my battery performance...
26 >
27 > So I changed the timer frequency back to 1000Hz, recompiled and now it
28 > seems a little faster, but no where near 2.6.12. It now boots in maybe
29 > 5 minutes, and the gdm theme takes about 5s to display.
30 >
31 > glxgears (not maximised) gives me about 30 fps with a radeon 9700!
32 >
33 > I checked the frequency governor, and the default is still
34 > 'performance'. /proc/acpi/processor/CPU0/throttling shows the maximum
35 > frequency is active as per normal.
36 >
37 > Other kernel options I changed are:
38 > - support for software suspend added (could this be it? I definitely saw
39 > the message that no valid suspend was found in my swapfile,
40 > and /proc/swaps shows that I have swap enabled as per usual)
41 > - removed unnecessary SCSI drivers (I don't have anything SCSI)
42 > - removed SATA support (I definitely don't have SATA)
43 >
44 > Info:
45 > Dell Ispiron 9100, 3 GHz HT Pentium 4
46 > 2.6.12 and 2.6.13: SMP support for 2 processors included
47 >
48 > I've seen 1 post online about the same thing - slow running 2.6.13, so
49 > surely there must be some people in the world running it ok! Any help
50 > on this would be appreciated.
51 >
52 > TIA,
53
54 --
55 Iain Buchanan <iaindb@××××××××××××.au>
56
57 --
58 gentoo-user@g.o mailing list

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-user] [smp related] 2.6.13 is 10x slower than 2.6.12! Richard Brown <mynamewasgone@×××××.com>
Re: [gentoo-user] [smp related] 2.6.13 is 10x slower than 2.6.12! fire-eyes <sgtphou@×××××××××.org>