| 1 |
On Mon, Jul 29, 2013 at 6:11 AM, <covici@××××××××××.com> wrote: |
| 2 |
> I want to -- at least in initial testing -- have systemd not try to do |
| 3 |
> things in parallell -- one at a time is very nice -- I even have openrc |
| 4 |
> configured that way. Any way to do this? |
| 5 |
|
| 6 |
No if you don't use --confirm-spawn AFAIK; the whole parallel start |
| 7 |
thingy is deeply integrated in systemd's design. And, why would you |
| 8 |
want to start things sequentially? |
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
And BTW, people who configure OpenRC to start things in parallel are |
| 11 |
going against the recommendations of its own maintaner: |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=391945#c10 |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
"rc_parallel has never officially been declared a stable feature (see |
| 16 |
the comments in rc.conf regarding this)." |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
OpenRC has never been able to reliable start services in parallel; on |
| 19 |
the other hand, you can argue that systemd was designed specifically |
| 20 |
to start services in parallel. |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
> Also, I do want an interactive boot like the I -- is confirm-spawn the |
| 23 |
> way to do this? |
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
Yes; you need to specify it on GRUB, LILO, or whatever boot loader you |
| 26 |
use, although I've never used it. |
| 27 |
|
| 28 |
> Thanks in advance for any suggestions. |
| 29 |
|
| 30 |
Regards. |
| 31 |
-- |
| 32 |
Canek Peláez Valdés |
| 33 |
Posgrado en Ciencia e Ingeniería de la Computación |
| 34 |
Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México |
Archives