1 |
On Wed, Jan 9, 2019 at 2:38 PM gevisz <gevisz@×××××.com> wrote: |
2 |
> |
3 |
> ср, 9 янв. 2019 г. в 19:36, Rich Freeman <rich0@g.o>: |
4 |
> > |
5 |
> > On Wed, Jan 9, 2019 at 6:21 AM gevisz <gevisz@×××××.com> wrote: |
6 |
> > > |
7 |
> > > On the other side, app-crypt/gkeys is marked by ~ |
8 |
> > > in my architecture (amd64). So, it is impossible |
9 |
> > > to update the portage snapshot signing key without |
10 |
> > > using non-recommended package. |
11 |
> Ok, not app-crypt/gentoo-keys package but |
12 |
> app-crypt/openpgp-keys-gentoo-release package. |
13 |
> |
14 |
> Does it matter? |
15 |
|
16 |
Sure, because you brought up issues with unrelated packages, like |
17 |
stable/unstable keywords, which aren't actually problems. |
18 |
|
19 |
> After that I have found out that a new |
20 |
> app-crypt/openpgp-keys-gentoo-release package |
21 |
> was released on 2 January 2019 when the previous |
22 |
> portage signing keys already expired. |
23 |
|
24 |
You probably should have led with that. Seems like an actual issue. |
25 |
Or at least lead with "I have this problem - what should I do?" and |
26 |
not basically starting out by accusing everybody of not caring about |
27 |
security. |
28 |
|
29 |
Really, though, an expired key fails safe - it blocks updates and |
30 |
doesn't cause you to install insecure ones. That is certainly how I'd |
31 |
prefer that it behaves. Sure, it would be better if keys were updated |
32 |
before they expire, but I tend to doubt that your email is going to do |
33 |
much to fix that. |
34 |
|
35 |
I don't use webrsync which is probably why I didn't personally notice |
36 |
this issue - I'm guessing it uses a different key than git but I |
37 |
haven't checked. |
38 |
|
39 |
-- |
40 |
Rich |