| 1 |
On Fri, 02 Oct 2009 13:57:44 +0300, "Arthur D." <spinal.by@××××.ru> wrote: |
| 2 |
>> So, if it can't find vim, we should go |
| 3 |
>> fix that ourselves and that is acceptable, but if it can't find nano |
| 4 |
then |
| 5 |
>> that's unacceptable for you, did I get it right? |
| 6 |
> Did you visit |
| 7 |
> http://www.rootshell.be/~spinal/gentoo_bug_report/286017.html ? |
| 8 |
|
| 9 |
Obviously I did. Otherwise I couldn't have commented on your patch for the |
| 10 |
ebuild. I also posted in that bug in case you missed it. |
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
> I was forced to offer the maintainer to respect at least vanilla sudo |
| 13 |
> behaviour. |
| 14 |
> You don't like something? Go ahead create a ticket and speak with Diego. |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
I don't have to open any bug this time, I am not the one that's not happy |
| 17 |
with sudo. ;) |
| 18 |
-- |
| 19 |
Jesús Guerrero |
Archives