| 1 |
On Thursday 23 Jun 2011, Alan McKinnon wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Thursday 23 June 2011 19:16:08 Neil Bothwick did opine thusly: |
| 3 |
> > On Thu, 23 Jun 2011 19:23:58 +0200, pk wrote: |
| 4 |
> > > It refuses to die because it's still very useful in certain |
| 5 |
> > > niche areas (hpc, numerical computing etc.) where "modern" |
| 6 |
> > > languages doesn't cut it... :-) |
| 7 |
> > |
| 8 |
> > Or so the Fortran programmers with jobs to protect will tell you... |
| 9 |
> > |
| 10 |
> > You'll be telling us there's still a place for Cobol next :-O |
| 11 |
> |
| 12 |
> Of course there's a place for Cobol, a classic one is in the bank my |
| 13 |
> gf does data warehousing at. |
| 14 |
> |
| 15 |
> There's not a single soul in the entire bank that is willing to sign |
| 16 |
> off on a project to replace the Cobol that has run |
| 17 |
> justfinethanksverymuch for 25+ years |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
It's the latest thing! http://visualcobol.microfocus.com/ |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
-Robin |
| 22 |
-- |
Archives