Gentoo Archives: gentoo-user

From: Francisco Ares <frares@×××××.com>
To: gentoo-user <gentoo-user@l.g.o>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] has anyone tried KDE5?
Date: Thu, 09 Oct 2014 17:45:28
Message-Id: CAHH9eM5prK_bwgsxOy=LDTVPKsNn=KgurOX7Afg641k2ahtOcA@mail.gmail.com
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-user] has anyone tried KDE5? by Mick
1 2014-10-07 12:20 GMT-03:00 Mick <michaelkintzios@×××××.com>:
2
3 > On Tuesday 07 Oct 2014 15:48:33 Philip Webb wrote:
4 > > 141007 Pavel Volkov wrote:
5 > > > On Sunday, October 5, 2014 9:10:50 PM MSK, Alan McKinnon wrote:
6 > > >> I haven't used konqueror as a browser in many many months,
7 > > >> I get along just fine with Firefox and Chromium.
8 > > >> I believe Konqueror is essentially unmaintained these days
9 > > >> or at least on life support. Make a fine file manager though
10 > > >> (kparts has always been one of KDE's very much better ideas)
11 > > >
12 > > > I think there was a tendency to replace Konqueror with rekonq
13 > > > in KDE-based distros. Can somebody comment on how rekonq is doing?
14 > >
15 > > I dropped Konqueror as an alternative browser recently
16 > > after it refused to accept every URL as malformed.
17 > > Rekonq is an adequate replacement + Firefox for regular use ;
18 > > I also use Lynx when I want text copies of WWW dox.
19 > > My window manager is Fluxbox.
20 >
21 > I still use Konqueror as file manager, ssh/ftp/webdav client and
22 > occasionally
23 > as an Internet browser. However, I have set it up to use WebKit as its
24 > browser engine instead of KHTML.
25 >
26 > --
27 > Regards,
28 > Mick
29 >
30
31
32 Hi,
33
34 How did you manage to get WebKit instead of KHTML? On my version, I can
35 only see the last.
36
37 Thanks, and Best Regards,
38 Francisco

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-user] has anyone tried KDE5? Alan McKinnon <alan.mckinnon@×××××.com>