1 |
2014-10-07 12:20 GMT-03:00 Mick <michaelkintzios@×××××.com>: |
2 |
|
3 |
> On Tuesday 07 Oct 2014 15:48:33 Philip Webb wrote: |
4 |
> > 141007 Pavel Volkov wrote: |
5 |
> > > On Sunday, October 5, 2014 9:10:50 PM MSK, Alan McKinnon wrote: |
6 |
> > >> I haven't used konqueror as a browser in many many months, |
7 |
> > >> I get along just fine with Firefox and Chromium. |
8 |
> > >> I believe Konqueror is essentially unmaintained these days |
9 |
> > >> or at least on life support. Make a fine file manager though |
10 |
> > >> (kparts has always been one of KDE's very much better ideas) |
11 |
> > > |
12 |
> > > I think there was a tendency to replace Konqueror with rekonq |
13 |
> > > in KDE-based distros. Can somebody comment on how rekonq is doing? |
14 |
> > |
15 |
> > I dropped Konqueror as an alternative browser recently |
16 |
> > after it refused to accept every URL as malformed. |
17 |
> > Rekonq is an adequate replacement + Firefox for regular use ; |
18 |
> > I also use Lynx when I want text copies of WWW dox. |
19 |
> > My window manager is Fluxbox. |
20 |
> |
21 |
> I still use Konqueror as file manager, ssh/ftp/webdav client and |
22 |
> occasionally |
23 |
> as an Internet browser. However, I have set it up to use WebKit as its |
24 |
> browser engine instead of KHTML. |
25 |
> |
26 |
> -- |
27 |
> Regards, |
28 |
> Mick |
29 |
> |
30 |
|
31 |
|
32 |
Hi, |
33 |
|
34 |
How did you manage to get WebKit instead of KHTML? On my version, I can |
35 |
only see the last. |
36 |
|
37 |
Thanks, and Best Regards, |
38 |
Francisco |