Gentoo Archives: gentoo-user

From: Richard Fish <bigfish@××××××××××.org>
To: gentoo-user@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: How serious is revdep-rebuild failure
Date: Fri, 25 Nov 2005 07:13:02
Message-Id: 7573e9640511242305y3e9a4dd3p6cf3cfbac2e70de3@mail.gmail.com
In Reply to: [gentoo-user] Re: How serious is revdep-rebuild failure by Harry Putnam
1 On 11/24/05, Harry Putnam <reader@×××××××.com> wrote:
2 > Richard Fish <bigfish@××××××××××.org> writes:
3 >
4 > > My guess is 'emerge -u --oneshot mjpegtools' will fix the problem.
5 >
6 > No, it didn't change a thing. But there was some output at the end
7 > that might mean something:
8 >
9 > [...]
10 > * Please upgrade your package (mjpegtools-1.6.2-r3) to use toolchain-funcs.eclass
11
12 Interesting. All 3 builds currently in portage (1.6.2-r4, 1.8.0, and
13 1.8.0-r1) use toolchain-funcs already.
14
15 What is the result of
16
17 ls /usr/portage/media-video/jpegtools/*.ebuild
18
19 and
20
21 equery depends mjpegtools
22
23 -Richard
24
25 --
26 gentoo-user@g.o mailing list

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-user] Re: How serious is revdep-rebuild failure Richard Fish <bigfish@××××××××××.org>
[gentoo-user] Re: How serious is revdep-rebuild failure Harry Putnam <reader@×××××××.com>