Gentoo Archives: gentoo-user

From: Hans-Werner Hilse <hilse@×××.de>
To: gentoo-user@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Routing problem ?
Date: Sun, 13 Jan 2008 13:07:18
Message-Id: 20080113140652.1c81cde9.hilse@web.de
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-user] Routing problem ? by Holla
1 Hi,
2
3 On Sun, 13 Jan 2008 16:42:56 +0530
4 Holla <holla.net@×××××.com> wrote:
5
6 > One thing, I cannot understand is the difference in traceroute
7 > results. What does this say in plain english ? :-)
8 >
9 > At PC2
10 > # traceroute 218.248.240.46 (ISP's DNS server)
11 > traceroute to 218.248.240.46 (218.248.240.46), 30 hops max, 40 byte packets
12 > 1 192.168.2.43 (192.168.2.43) 1.730 ms 0.840 ms 0.920 ms
13 > 2 192.168.1.1 (192.168.1.1) 1.440 ms 1.469 ms 1.287 ms
14 > 3 * * *
15 > 4 * * *
16 >
17 > At PC1
18 >
19 > # traceroute 218.248.240.46
20 > traceroute to 218.248.240.46 (218.248.240.46), 30 hops max, 40 byte packets
21 > 1 192.168.1.1 (192.168.1.1) 0.848 ms 0.706 ms 0.681 ms
22 > 2 117.192.128.1 (117.192.128.1) 19.712 ms 18.878 ms 19.920 ms
23 > 3 218.248.160.134 (218.248.160.134) 19.292 ms 19.796 ms 19.190 ms
24
25 I'd say your router (Router1) isn't doing NAT for packets from other
26 subnets than it's LAN interface is configured for -- regardless of the
27 (correctly) configured internal additional route.
28
29 So your option would be to set up PC1 for doing NAT, not necessarily
30 for packets 192.168.2/24<->192.168.1/24, but for all packets from
31 192.168.2/24 going to the internet.
32
33 Your provider most likely does not have anything to do with all this.
34
35 -hwh
36 --
37 gentoo-user@l.g.o mailing list

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-user] Routing problem ? Mick <michaelkintzios@×××××.com>