1 |
Philip Webb <purslow <at> ca.inter.net> writes: |
2 |
|
3 |
> Since my AMD machines have been more successful than the Intels, |
4 |
> I intend to use an AMD CPU again & anyway they seem to be |
5 |
> cheaper & faster. Gigabyte mobos are cheaper & it has been good in ANB4. |
6 |
|
7 |
I built some FX-8350 system on Gigabyte mobo (990-FXA) sata 3 and they |
8 |
are just wonderful. I did put water coolers and a radiator on them |
9 |
to keep the CPUs super cool. I have not over clocked them (yet) but |
10 |
it is all set up. Folks often overclock these rigs at 5 or 6 GHz, from |
11 |
what I read. 32 gig of ram is sweet on these systems, at a |
12 |
very attractive price point. I opted for max ram, vs a SSD. ymmv. |
13 |
|
14 |
|
15 |
> I am a bit shocked at the big increase in price |
16 |
> for a smaller increase in overall performance, |
17 |
> but I can afford the parts as described ; prices in CAD, of course. |
18 |
|
19 |
|
20 |
Check the newegg pricing as a reference. |
21 |
|
22 |
Video:: AMD/ATI has a new smoking video card out that is tops in |
23 |
memory bandwidth. Consider the fact that GCC-5.2+ allows one to |
24 |
compile and use the processor and memory resources of the hi end |
25 |
video card (nvidia, intel, amd and other in this open standard); |
26 |
I give some deep thought into putting those discretionary funds |
27 |
into an advanced video card [1]. For sure this is still in the |
28 |
developmental stages, but tons of ddr5 memory added to the system |
29 |
resources is going to be a game changer once things stabilize. |
30 |
|
31 |
|
32 |
So I'm not really pushing any sort of hardware. But things are changing |
33 |
with gcc-5.x so unless you are running big database/web sorts of codes, a |
34 |
smaller amount of faster memory might just be the best performance/cost. |
35 |
Max out the mobo ram first, with the fastest memory it can handle. ymmv. |
36 |
|
37 |
hth, |
38 |
James |
39 |
|
40 |
|
41 |
[1] http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16814125797. |