| 1 |
»Q« wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Wed, 13 Apr 2016 16:55:56 -0500 |
| 3 |
> Dale <rdalek1967@×××××.com> wrote: |
| 4 |
> |
| 5 |
>> Marc Joliet wrote: |
| 6 |
>>> On Wednesday 13 April 2016 16:20:06 Dale wrote: |
| 7 |
>>> |
| 8 |
>>>> May I ask where portpeek comes from? I don't have it installed |
| 9 |
>>>> here. |
| 10 |
>>> Sure thing, it's in app-portage/portpeek. |
| 11 |
> |
| 12 |
>> Well I would have never even guessed that one. ROFL Let's file a bug |
| 13 |
>> report and get them to change the name to something no one would ever |
| 14 |
>> guess. LOL |
| 15 |
> Let's call it hal! |
| 16 |
> |
| 17 |
> /me ducks |
| 18 |
> |
| 19 |
> Seriously, thanks for pointing us to portpeek, Marc. :) |
| 20 |
> |
| 21 |
> |
| 22 |
> |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
I been using eix-test-* for a while. It works fairly well and helps me |
| 25 |
clean out the cruft. It seems portpeek finds some things eix misses |
| 26 |
tho. I'm not sure how either does their thing but portpeek has more |
| 27 |
results plus it is color coded as well. ;-) |
| 28 |
|
| 29 |
I might add, it has a shorter name. Thank goodness for tab completion. |
| 30 |
eix-t hit tab. ;-) |
| 31 |
|
| 32 |
Odd you mention hal. One of the hits was a USE flag that disables hal. |
| 33 |
I was able to delete that line since hal is long gone. I started to |
| 34 |
leave it there just in case tho. lol |
| 35 |
|
| 36 |
Dale |
| 37 |
|
| 38 |
:-) :-) |
Archives