| 1 |
On Tuesday 13 March 2007 17:38:24 de Almeida, Valmor F. wrote: |
| 2 |
> A related issue. My current gcc version is 3.3.6 and the new profile is |
| 3 |
> pulling an update |
| 4 |
[SNIP] |
| 5 |
> and also the new 4.1. |
| 6 |
> |
| 7 |
> [ebuild NS ] sys-devel/gcc-4.1.1-r3 USE="doc fortran nls (-altivec) |
| 8 |
> -bootstrap -build -gcj -gtk (-hardened) -ip28 -ip32r10k -mudflap |
| 9 |
> (-multilib) -multislot (-n32) (-n64) -nocxx -objc -objc++ -objc-gc -test |
| 10 |
> -vanilla" 38,326 kB |
| 11 |
> |
| 12 |
> I am worried about some of the flags. Notably, -nocxx. The description |
| 13 |
> of this flag in /usr/portage/profiles/use.desc |
| 14 |
> |
| 15 |
> nocxx - Disable support for C++ (DON'T USE THIS UNLESS YOU KNOW WHAT |
| 16 |
> YOU'RE DOING) |
| 17 |
> |
| 18 |
> -nocxx is been set by the 2006.1 profile; I guess. |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
Clearly it is not set as indicated by the minus in front of it. And it should |
| 21 |
be set. Please read the handbook... |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
http://www.gentoo.org/doc/en/handbook/handbook-x86.xml?part=2&chap=2 |
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
> Also is gcc-4.1 in a pretty good shape to use? |
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
Sure. As long as you follow the gcc upgrade guide carefully. |
| 28 |
|
| 29 |
http://www.gentoo.org/doc/en/gcc-upgrading.xml |
| 30 |
|
| 31 |
-- |
| 32 |
Bo Andresen |
Archives