Archives
Archives
| From: | Graham Murray <graham@×××××××××××.uk> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-user@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-user] gcc-4.3.x and Core 2 Duo, safe way | ||
| Date: | Mon, 09 Jun 2008 05:43:44 | ||
| Message-Id: | 87od6bb1te.fsf@newton.gmurray.org.uk | ||
| In Reply to: | [gentoo-user] gcc-4.3.x and Core 2 Duo, safe way by Andrew Gaydenko |
||
| 1 | Andrew Gaydenko <a@××××××××.com> writes: |
| 2 | |
| 3 | > gcc-4.3.1 is umasked now. I'm on ~amd64 with Core 2 Duo CPU. Is it |
| 4 | > sufficient just to set |
| 5 | > |
| 6 | > CFLAGS="-O2 -march=core2 -mtune=core2 -pipe" |
| 7 | > |
| 8 | > instead of |
| 9 | > |
| 10 | > CFLAGS="-O2 -march=native -mtune=native -pipe" |
| 11 | > |
| 12 | > which I have in make.conf now? Are there any other things to do? |
| 13 | |
| 14 | Should the two not be equivalent? On a core2 processor, should |
| 15 | -march=native not generate code for the core2? |
| 16 | -- |
| 17 | gentoo-user@l.g.o mailing list |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| Re: [gentoo-user] gcc-4.3.x and Core 2 Duo, safe way | Andrew Gaydenko <a@××××××××.com> |
| Re: [gentoo-user] gcc-4.3.x and Core 2 Duo, safe way | Justin <justin@×××××××××.net> |
| Re: [gentoo-user] gcc-4.3.x and Core 2 Duo, safe way | Robert Bridge <robert@××××××××.com> |