1 |
James <wireless@×××××××××××.com> wrote: |
2 |
|
3 |
> <meino.cramer <at> gmx.de> writes: |
4 |
> |
5 |
> |
6 |
> > > > But: Shutdown (as recommmended by acmesystems "shutdown -h -H now") |
7 |
> > > > REBOOTS the system instead of powering it down. |
8 |
> |
9 |
> > > What about "halt"? man halt |
10 |
> |
11 |
> > The problem I think is burried |
12 |
> |
13 |
> Okay, ferret it out. |
14 |
> |
15 |
> Does this accomplish what you want: |
16 |
> |
17 |
> |
18 |
> "sync;sync;sync;halt" ? |
19 |
|
20 |
Do you believe that a method described for early AT&T UNIX (early to mid 1970s) |
21 |
where "halt" did not yet exist is a valid idea for Linux? |
22 |
|
23 |
Jörg |
24 |
|
25 |
-- |
26 |
EMail:joerg@××××××.net (home) Jörg Schilling D-13353 Berlin |
27 |
joerg.schilling@××××××××××××××××.de (work) Blog: http://schily.blogspot.com/ |
28 |
URL: http://cdrecord.org/private/ http://sourceforge.net/projects/schilytools/files/' |