| 1 |
On 11/1/05, Benno Schulenberg <benno.schulenberg@×××××.com> wrote: |
| 2 |
> |
| 3 |
> Today the updating of the portage cache was real quick -- something |
| 4 |
> like a minute, instead of the ten minutes it used to take during |
| 5 |
> the past month or so. What has changed? |
| 6 |
> |
| 7 |
> Was it the r2 to r3 update on glibc-2.3.5? Did I emerge something |
| 8 |
> in the meantime that Portage uses if present but does not depend |
| 9 |
> upon? (lzo?) Or was a whole lot of data removed from the tree? |
| 10 |
> |
| 11 |
> Benno |
| 12 |
> -- |
| 13 |
> gentoo-user@g.o mailing list |
| 14 |
> |
| 15 |
> Have you ran some command that caches the portage dir to memory before |
| 16 |
updating portage cache? That normally speeds up.. but then again, maybe |
| 17 |
there were changes so that the annoying problem got fixed... |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
Fernando |
Archives