Gentoo Archives: gentoo-user

From: Peter Humphrey <peter@××××××××××××.uk>
To: gentoo-user@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Is --changed-deps going to be *that* useless?
Date: Mon, 26 Feb 2018 23:52:32
Message-Id: 1996245.gLBE3ShqZq@peak
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Is --changed-deps going to be *that* useless? by Michael Orlitzky
1 On Monday, 26 February 2018 15:24:40 GMT Michael Orlitzky wrote:
2 > On 02/26/2018 10:16 AM, Peter Humphrey wrote:
3 > > Well, I'm on amd64, not ~amd64, and this morning portage wanted to
4 > > remerge 217 packages. Removing --changed-deps reduced that to one:
5 > > sys-devel/llvm.
6 > You do need to reinstall those.
7 >
8 > The latest (un)stable versions of automake are hard-coded in
9 > autotools.eclass, and they wind up in the dependency string of every
10 > ebuild that uses the eclass. It's stupid, we don't need to do it, and it
11 > breaks all of those packages for other PMS-compliant package managers
12 > (--changed-deps is portage-only). Sorry, we can't make people not do
13 > this, apparently.
14
15 Right. Now where do I submit my claim for two-and-a-half hours of time spent
16 on pointless recompiling? ;-)
17
18 --
19 Regards,
20 Peter.