1 |
Am Sun, 11 May 2014 09:53:10 +0100 |
2 |
schrieb Mick <michaelkintzios@×××××.com>: |
3 |
|
4 |
> On Saturday 10 May 2014 10:33:19 William Kenworthy wrote: |
5 |
> > Note that as I said in my original |
6 |
> > email, "dirvish" really hammers a file system and only reiserfs seems to |
7 |
> > withstand it though I have gotten errors with it in the past. Ive tried |
8 |
> > ext4 (takes only a couple of backup sessions and its unrecoverable, |
9 |
> > btrfs an occasional error with two complete losses of the |
10 |
> > partition/filesystem since Christmas and reiserfs gets rare errors. |
11 |
> |
12 |
> |
13 |
> I moved away from reisefs to ext4 because I was getting some random lockups |
14 |
> when I/O was high. While on reiserfs I also had a couple of corrupt mysql |
15 |
> files and all around poor performance. Now, this was on a machine with a |
16 |
> deficient PSU (I replaced a couple of capacitors since then and it is now |
17 |
> working properly) so I don't want to blame the filesystem because of this |
18 |
> hardware problem. In any case, under these impaired conditions ext4 was a |
19 |
> much better performing filesystem than reiserfs. No lock ups, significantly |
20 |
> faster and no corruption was observed in normal operation - I didn't try to |
21 |
> hammer it. |
22 |
> |
23 |
> So I read your paragraph above with surprise, because in my experience the |
24 |
> opposite was true. At the time I thought that reiserfs was perhaps suffering |
25 |
> from bitrot, because these symptoms had gotten worse over time. This is on an |
26 |
> installation running since 2005. Not sure what to conclude from these |
27 |
> anecdotal observations ... :-/ |
28 |
|
29 |
I remember that OpenSuse also changed their default from ReiserFS to Ext3 for |
30 |
similar reasons [0]. I never experienced any problems with ReiserFS, but I also |
31 |
got the impression that it was going nowhere and that if I wanted a reliable |
32 |
system, Ext4 was the way to go. |
33 |
|
34 |
Although funnily enough, when browsing through the btrfs ML, Duncan [1] shares |
35 |
William's experience of ReiserFS being more resilient than even Ext4. In fact, |
36 |
he writes that one reason he trusts btrfs to the degree he does is that Chris |
37 |
Mason (the btrfs lead developer, for those who don't know) has a history with |
38 |
ReiserFS (he used to work on it for SuSE [2]). |
39 |
|
40 |
So yeah, as has been said already, everyone has different experiences. |
41 |
|
42 |
[0] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reiserfs#Move_away_from_ReiserFS_to_ext3 |
43 |
[1] He used to be a regular in gentoo-amd64, when it was still active; yes, you |
44 |
know, the guy who wrote the longest emails ;) . |
45 |
[2] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Btrfs#History |
46 |
-- |
47 |
Marc Joliet |
48 |
-- |
49 |
"People who think they know everything really annoy those of us who know we |
50 |
don't" - Bjarne Stroustrup |