| 1 |
On 7/30/07, Joshua Doll <Joshua.Doll@×××××.com> wrote: |
| 2 |
> Joshua Doll wrote: |
| 3 |
> > Daniel da Veiga wrote: |
| 4 |
> >> On 7/30/07, Albert Hopkins <marduk@g.o> wrote: |
| 5 |
> >> |
| 6 |
> >>> On Mon, 2007-07-30 at 13:33 -0300, Daniel da Veiga wrote: |
| 7 |
> >>> |
| 8 |
> >>>> Hi list, |
| 9 |
> >>>> |
| 10 |
> >>>> I've been struggling with this for a while, I am setting up this new |
| 11 |
> >>>> machine, but got stuck because I can't find a way to make the network |
| 12 |
> >>>> card work... According to lspci: |
| 13 |
> >>>> |
| 14 |
> >>>> 02:00.0 Ethernet controller: Intel Corporation 82573E Gigabit Ethernet |
| 15 |
> >>>> Controller (Copper) (rev 03) |
| 16 |
> >>>> |
| 17 |
> >>>> The weird thing is, it works just fine when booting the LiveCD, |
| 18 |
> >>>> dmesg shows: |
| 19 |
> >>>> |
| 20 |
> >>>> Intel(R) PRO/1000 Network Driver - version 7.2.9-k4 |
| 21 |
> >>>> Copyright (c) 1999-2006 Intel Corporation. |
| 22 |
> >>>> ACPI: PCI Interrupt 0000:02:00.0[A] -> GSI 16 (level, low) -> IRQ 17 |
| 23 |
> >>>> PCI: Setting latency timer of device 0000:02:00.0 to 64 |
| 24 |
> >>>> e1000: 0000:02:00.0: e1000_probe: (PCI Express:2.5Gb/s:32-bit) |
| 25 |
> >>>> 00:10:c6:a1:5a:41 |
| 26 |
> >>>> e1000: eth0: e1000_probe: Intel PRO/1000 Network Connection |
| 27 |
> >>>> e1000: eth0: e1000_watchdog: NIC Link is Up 100 Mbps Full Duplex |
| 28 |
> >>>> e1000: eth0: e1000_watchdog: 10/1000 speed: disabling TSO |
| 29 |
> >>>> |
| 30 |
> >>>> but when booting the local kernel: |
| 31 |
> >>>> |
| 32 |
> >>>> Intel(R) PRO/1000 Network Driver - version 7.2.9-k4 |
| 33 |
> >>>> Copyright (c) 1999-2006 Intel Corporation. |
| 34 |
> >>>> ACPI: PCI Interrupt 0000:02:00.0[A] -> GSI 16 (level, low) -> IRQ 17 |
| 35 |
> >>>> PCI: Setting latency timer of device 0000:02:00.0 to 64 |
| 36 |
> >>>> e1000: eth0: e1000_probe: Intel PRO/1000 Network Connection |
| 37 |
> >>>> |
| 38 |
> >>> It appears as if driver works and has created the device but... |
| 39 |
> >>> |
| 40 |
> >>> |
| 41 |
> >> |
| 42 |
> >> The device was not created (and yeah, that's weird since there's a |
| 43 |
> >> mention to "eth0" in dmesg), also the init script is there and there |
| 44 |
> >> is a config for the interface at rc.conf/net. It seems the probe is |
| 45 |
> >> not working, as it never detects the link is up or down... |
| 46 |
> >> |
| 47 |
> >> |
| 48 |
> > What does ifconfig -a return? A lot of times udev will "remap" the |
| 49 |
> > device name. Especially if there is IP over firewall. |
| 50 |
> > |
| 51 |
> > |
| 52 |
> > --Joshua Doll |
| 53 |
> Opps firewire not firewall. Long weekend. |
| 54 |
> |
| 55 |
|
| 56 |
Happens to me all the time... |
| 57 |
|
| 58 |
ifconfig -a shows only "lo". |
| 59 |
|
| 60 |
I tried some crazy stunts (like copying the module from the livecd) |
| 61 |
and now I got the interface listed, but it doesn't work and yells a |
| 62 |
lot of "SIOCSIFFLAGS: Function not implemented" messages, along with |
| 63 |
"Unable to allocate interrupt Error: -38" in dmesg. |
| 64 |
|
| 65 |
I'm in the process of recompiling the kernel right now, and I hope |
| 66 |
that will solve it (so far I only compiled the kernel while in the |
| 67 |
LiveCD chroot, but now I have all packages and thus I'm trying to |
| 68 |
compile it at the real system). That should make no difference, but |
| 69 |
I'm trying everything... |
| 70 |
|
| 71 |
-- |
| 72 |
Daniel da Veiga |
| 73 |
Computer Operator - RS - Brazil |
| 74 |
-----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK----- |
| 75 |
Version: 3.1 |
| 76 |
GCM/IT/P/O d-? s:- a? C++$ UBLA++ P+ L++ E--- W+++$ N o+ K- w O M- V- |
| 77 |
PS PE Y PGP- t+ 5 X+++ R+* tv b+ DI+++ D+ G+ e h+ r+ y++ |
| 78 |
------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------ |
| 79 |
-- |
| 80 |
gentoo-user@g.o mailing list |
Archives