| 1 |
On Sun, 8 Feb 2009 01:57:39 +0100 (CET), Jesús Guerrero wrote: |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
> Yes. That's true and I agree. But since emacs was proposed |
| 4 |
> as a way to overcome the natural limitations of info, I guess |
| 5 |
> that's completely fair if others point out also the disadvantages |
| 6 |
> of doing so. All in all, we could also say how nice is man in |
| 7 |
> konqueror, but that wouldn't be fair, would it? |
| 8 |
|
| 9 |
Everyone's more or less agreeing here, that the info format is useful but |
| 10 |
the standard info reader sucks. Once you start reading info pages in a |
| 11 |
decent reader, like Konqueror, they are useful for more complex |
| 12 |
documents. Although I'd still prefer HTML, mainly because of the |
| 13 |
wide choice of readers available. |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
-- |
| 17 |
Neil Bothwick |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
Don't take life too seriously, you won't get out alive. |
Archives