Gentoo Archives: gentoo-user

From: "J. Roeleveld" <joost@××××××××.org>
To: gentoo-user@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] At last! A Qt5 version of KMail-2 - but here be dragons!
Date: Thu, 29 Dec 2016 18:10:39
Message-Id: 46595964-8AD7-4E62-B4A1-661F3EBB5DDC@antarean.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-user] At last! A Qt5 version of KMail-2 - but here be dragons! by "J. Roeleveld"
1 Sorry for double post...
2 Kmail:5 doesn't show email as being sent....
3
4 Will check again after full synchronisation. (Mailfolder is quite large)
5
6
7 On December 29, 2016 6:54:33 PM GMT+01:00, "J. Roeleveld" <joost@××××××××.org> wrote:
8 >On Wednesday, December 28, 2016 11:11:27 AM CET J. Roeleveld wrote:
9 >> On December 27, 2016 3:38:28 PM GMT+01:00, Peter Humphrey
10 ><peter@××××××××××××.uk> wrote:
11 >> >On Sunday, 18 December 2016 19:07:23 GMT J. Roeleveld wrote:
12 >> >> More important, how is the latest kmail behaving?
13 >> >
14 >> >My first impression is one of horror. It's ghastly!
15 >> >
16 >> >I've never seen such profligate waste of screen space. I've attached
17 >a
18 >> >couple of screen shots to show you what I mean.
19 >> >
20 >> >Take the folder list, for example. I used to be able to show all
21 >those
22 >> >folders in one panel with no scroll-bars, with no difficulty reading
23 >> >them;
24 >> >now eight folders spill over. I may be able to find a more compact
25 >> >arrangement but this is the best I've managed so far. At least with
26 >> >kmail:4
27 >> >I could tweak Qt settings to condense it; now nothing I do makes any
28 >> >improvement.
29 >> >
30 >> >Then the message view. Message.png shows what your message looks
31 >like
32 >> >in
33 >> >this version of KMail (the message I'm replying to now). This is
34 >with
35 >> >all
36 >> >the bells and whistles I can find switched off.
37 >> >
38 >> >Next, after I'd emerged kde-apps/kmai-16.12.0, it was incomplete. I
39 >had
40 >> >to
41 >> >install several other packages to complete it, including the import
42 >> >wizard.
43 >> >Rather than messing about, I just emerged kdepim-meta and had done
44 >with
45 >> >it.
46 >> >
47 >> >Even after doing that, I get "No backend available for spell
48 >checking,"
49 >> >even
50 >> >though I've set everything up that I can see. Myspell and hunspell
51 >are
52 >> >both
53 >> >installed.
54 >> >
55 >> >In the message list I have next-to-no control over the font. I can
56 >set
57 >> >the
58 >> >basic one, but not those for unread, important or action items.
59 >They're
60 >> >now
61 >> >displayed in a reduced-density form of the basic font (while
62 >pretending
63 >> >
64 >> >they're going to use the same font as the message itself). The
65 >> >designers
66 >> >evidently know what I want better than I do (anyone might think this
67 >> >was
68 >> >Gnome).
69 >> >
70 >> >Nothing to do with KMail, but the display of gkrellm has changed
71 >> >dramatically. I use its Invisible theme, which hasn't actually been
72 >> >invisible since the switch from KDE-3 to 4, but it had a plain,
73 >> >unobtrusive
74 >> >grey scheme and showed what I wanted to see, clearly and with no
75 >drama.
76 >> >Now,
77 >> >the chart backgrounds have changed from charcoal-grey to a dark red,
78 >> >and
79 >> >what was grey is now a dreadful salmon-pink. Of course I can't see
80 >the
81 >> >red
82 >> >traces any longer. Perhaps I'm missing a KDE or Qt component.
83 >> >
84 >> >Oh, and when I start a reboot in KDE, akonadi crashes with a
85 >> >segmentation
86 >> >fault.
87 >> >
88 >> >I dare say version 16.12.0 of KMail-2 will make a decent platform
89 >for
90 >> >development, now that it's finally here, but a very great deal of
91 >work
92 >> >lies
93 >> >ahead. I can see that I'll be doing my fair share of shouting too,
94 >at
95 >> >it and
96 >> >at the devs.
97 >> >
98 >> >It's taken me about 30 hours to get this far. I ditched the old
99 >system
100 >> >altogether and built a new one on the kde-plasma profile. I didn't
101 >ask
102 >> >for
103 >> >anything in a slot 4, just slot 5 versions. I also ditched my old
104 >user
105 >> >and
106 >> >set up a new one from scratch. Headache? What headache?
107 >> >
108 >> >I think I'll have to go down the pub to drown my sorrows.
109 >>
110 >> My impressions will start here. Emailing using mobile while the IMAP
111 >mail is
112 >> being synchronised. That usually takes a few hours.
113 >>
114 >> Although that does appear to go faster now. I normally use Kontact
115 >for the
116 >> whole shebang. And it looks similar to version 4.
117 >>
118 >> The upgrade went quite smoothly, with a very rigorous cleaning
119 >exercise of
120 >> anything wanting older versions. Am expecting some possible issues
121 >when
122 >> reinstalling those. But will see how that goes later today.
123 >>
124 >> Full upgrade only took a couple of hours this morning.
125 >>
126 >> --
127 >> Joost
128 >
129 >Ok, update time.
130 >I haven't been able to do much with it today as I had to go to the
131 >office.
132 >
133 >When I came back, various stuff had failed, but this is due to
134 >synchronizing
135 >all email (old offline-imap option) to the desktop and the
136 >home-partition had
137 >filled up.
138 >I cleaned up all the kdepim config-files and the database tables again
139 >and
140 >started kontact with a clean config. It is, again, synchronizing.
141 >
142 >I did not experience any crashes of akonadi or kontact during normal
143 >use and
144 >shutting down of applications (including akonadictl stop).
145 >With the exception of what I mentioned before, which can not be blamed
146 >on
147 >akonadi.
148 >
149 >Things I like so far:
150 >- Synchronisation seems to be faster, so is the rest of the interface.
151 >- Synchronisation of groupdav is smoother
152 >- There finally is a decent option to connect to office365 (including
153 >calendar)
154 >(with the above, I have only tested loading data, not tested modifying
155 >anything yet)
156 >
157 >Things I miss:
158 >- A configuration option inside "systemsettings", can not find the kcm
159 >for
160 >akonadi:5.
161 >- I can't find the little "-" icons which were present in the
162 >screenshots from
163 >Peter Humphrey. I was actually hoping to test those, but they don't
164 >appear.
165 >
166 >Things I don't like so far:
167 >- The default colour scheme (unread emails are by default a very
168 >light-colour
169 >blue, I prefer the old colourscheme.
170 >- Having to get rid of kmymoney due to incompatible libraries. (Why
171 >does a
172 >financial app have a hard-dependency on kdepimlibs????)
173 >
174 >More updates are likely to follow, if people are actually interested.
175 >
176 >The update to the current in-portage-tree version went quite smoothly
177 >once the
178 >blocking packages were identified and removed. (All of kdepim:4 needs
179 >to be
180 >removed first for portage to be able to identify all required
181 >keyword-changes)
182 >This was mostly due to running a mixed stable and unstable setup.
183 >
184 >If anyone is interested, I can provide the full keyword file I used.
185 >
186 >--
187 >Joost
188
189
190 --
191 Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.