| 1 |
On 20/11/2016 02:43, Harry Putnam wrote: |
| 2 |
> |
| 3 |
> [...] |
| 4 |
> |
| 5 |
> Neil Bothwick <neil@××××××××××.uk> writes: |
| 6 |
> |
| 7 |
>> You can create a set containing a list of packages. I do this for |
| 8 |
>> dependencies of packages that are not from portage, so they don't get |
| 9 |
>> depcleaned and don't end up in @world. Something like |
| 10 |
> |
| 11 |
> [...] |
| 12 |
> Thanks for the nifty examples... ... missing entirely in the pile of |
| 13 |
> documenation at /usr/share/doc/portage-2.3.2/html/index.html |
| 14 |
> (if you have USE=doc set) |
| 15 |
> |
| 16 |
>> % cat /etc/portage/sets.conf |
| 17 |
>> [kernels] |
| 18 |
>> class = portage.sets.dbapi.OwnerSet |
| 19 |
>> world-candidate = False |
| 20 |
>> files = /usr/src |
| 21 |
>> |
| 22 |
>> then emerge -n @kernels |
| 23 |
> |
| 24 |
> This one kind of sails right over my head... not seeing what is |
| 25 |
> supposed to happen. |
| 26 |
> |
| 27 |
> [...] |
| 28 |
> |
| 29 |
> Alan McKinnon <alan.mckinnon@×××××.com> writes: |
| 30 |
> |
| 31 |
> [...] |
| 32 |
> |
| 33 |
>> Think of it as sort of like a magic meta-package that you define - a set |
| 34 |
>> gets merged as a unit and where you unmerge it, the sets is out of world |
| 35 |
>> and depclean will take care of removing the members. |
| 36 |
>> |
| 37 |
>> Simple as that. I'm not aware of anything in FEATURES related to sets, |
| 38 |
>> you just use them out the box. |
| 39 |
> |
| 40 |
> Gack, I was following along OK until the part about `out of the box' |
| 41 |
> |
| 42 |
> Do you mean those toxic looking definitions or other stuff in the docs |
| 43 |
> at /usr/share/doc/portage-2.3.2/html/index.html? ... |
| 44 |
> |
| 45 |
> |
| 46 |
|
| 47 |
|
| 48 |
No, I mean: |
| 49 |
|
| 50 |
install portage |
| 51 |
vi /etc/portage/sets/mystuff |
| 52 |
emerge @mystuff |
| 53 |
|
| 54 |
|
| 55 |
-- |
| 56 |
Alan McKinnon |
| 57 |
alan.mckinnon@×××××.com |
Archives