Gentoo Archives: gentoo-user

From: "Kacper Kopczyński" <capsel@××××××××××××.pl>
To: gentoo-user@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] OT: hard disk access and recovery impossible under linux ?
Date: Sun, 08 Aug 2010 17:54:58
Message-Id: 20100808195337.6b1b91f7@matrix.inten.pl
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-user] OT: hard disk access and recovery impossible under linux ? by Mark Shields
1 Dnia 2010-08-08, o godz. 12:19:07
2 Mark Shields <laebshade@×××××.com> napisał(a):
3
4 > On Sat, Jul 31, 2010 at 3:14 PM, Volker Armin Hemmann <
5 > volkerarmin@××××××××××.com> wrote:
6 >
7 > > On Samstag 31 Juli 2010, Mick wrote:
8 > > > On Saturday 31 July 2010 19:04:47 Volker Armin Hemmann wrote:
9 > > > > On Samstag 31 Juli 2010, Mick wrote:
10 > > > > > On Saturday 31 July 2010 16:33:18 Dale wrote:
11 > > > > > > Kacper Kopczyński wrote:
12 > > > > > > > Dnia 2010-07-31, o godz. 16:15:51
13 > > > > > > >
14 > > > > > > > Volker Armin Hemmann<volkerarmin@××××××××××.com>
15 > > > > > > > napisał(a):
16 > > > > > > >> On Samstag 31 Juli 2010, Kacper Kopczyński wrote:
17 > > > > > > >>> Hi,
18 > > > > > > >>>
19 > > > > > > >>> My problem is really strange - I can't access my hard
20 > > > > > > >>> drive
21 > > from
22 > > > > > > >>> linux, but it works from windows without problems. It
23 > > > > > > >>> has some bad blocks.
24 > > > > > > >>
25 > > > > > > >> it has a lot of bad blocks and a fucked up firmware it
26 > > > > > > >> seems. No way it is working 'without problems'.
27 > > > > > > >
28 > > > > > > > Well total space taken by bad blocks according to chkdsk
29 > > > > > > > is less than 1MB, windows is still able to access all
30 > > > > > > > data. Linux is only able to see partition table "for a
31 > > > > > > > while" - as you can see in dmesg.
32 > > > > > > >
33 > > > > > > > If firmware is broken then how it is possible that
34 > > > > > > > windows is
35 > > able
36 > > > > > > > to use this disk?
37 > > > > > >
38 > > > > > > Maybe windoze is ignoring the problem? It's not like
39 > > > > > > windoze has never done that before right?
40 > > > > > >
41 > > > > > > Just a thought.
42 > > > > >
43 > > > > > Couldn't it be that the MSWindows partition has no bad
44 > > > > > blocks, while Linux does?
45 > > > >
46 > > > > it is not about partitions.
47 > > >
48 > > > Please explain, I thought that bad blocks would coincide with some
49 > > > partitions.
50 > >
51 > > because defectice partitions don't give you no sense errors nor do
52 > > they give
53 > > you zero capacity errors. Read his dmesg.
54 > >
55 > > If the firmware/logic board is bad, you might be able to replace
56 > > it with
57 > one from the same model. I've heard of some success from a coworker
58 > who took the logic board from a known good drive and put it on a HDD
59 > with good internals but a bad logic board, and it worked. That's if
60 > you need the data, that is.
61 >
62 > - Mark Shields
63
64 After spending many hours on google it seems to me this is a bug in
65 firmware or seagate's firmware on barracuda discs likes to break itself
66 frequently.
67
68 Thank you for your help.
69
70 --
71 Kacper Kopczyński