| 1 |
In linux.gentoo.user, you wrote: |
| 2 |
> --20cf3054aa33c36405049f87abd7 |
| 3 |
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 |
| 4 |
> |
| 5 |
> On 28 March 2011 10:11, Mick <michaelkintzios@×××××.com> wrote: |
| 6 |
> |
| 7 |
>> On Monday 28 March 2011 09:43:47 JM wrote: |
| 8 |
>> > to-posting? |
| 9 |
>> |
| 10 |
>> Neil meant to say "top-posting": |
| 11 |
>> |
| 12 |
>> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style |
| 13 |
>> |
| 14 |
>> and |
| 15 |
>> |
| 16 |
>> http://www.caliburn.nl/topposting.html |
| 17 |
>> |
| 18 |
>> (there are many links if you google about netiquette and usenet etiquette). |
| 19 |
>> |
| 20 |
>> BTW, some typos like Neil's are allowed to keep the rest of us on our toes. |
| 21 |
>> ;-) |
| 22 |
>> -- |
| 23 |
>> Regards, |
| 24 |
>> Mick |
| 25 |
>> |
| 26 |
> |
| 27 |
> lol - I'll ask google to alter gmail for me :) |
| 28 |
> |
| 29 |
|
| 30 |
It hardly matters I'm sure, since those of us who read this list on |
| 31 |
usenet with slrn can easily see the incompetent mess kmail makes of mail. |
| 32 |
Yet it's what most here seem to prefer for some weird reason. |
| 33 |
|
| 34 |
But yes, top posting does suck -- almost as badly as all the |
| 35 |
"==20" crap polluting all the kmail users' messages. Almost. |
| 36 |
|
| 37 |
:) |
| 38 |
|
| 39 |
-- |
| 40 |
...she kept arranging and rearranging the rabbit and kind of waving to it. I decided, "this is the person I want to sit next to". |
Archives