1 |
* Harry Putnam (reader@×××××××.com) [12.06.09 16:41]: |
2 |
> |
3 |
> There is a patch offered but still one would think using standard |
4 |
> emerge on a package that is outside the `~' daredevil stage and is not |
5 |
> masked, it should `just work' [tm]. |
6 |
> |
7 |
> |
8 |
|
9 |
When I read the bug rightfully, procmail did not build with glibc |
10 |
2.10.1, which is *not* stable yet, especially because of a lot packages |
11 |
which don't build cleanly with it at the moment. |
12 |
|
13 |
So if you'd use the stable glibc it would build fine. There is no need |
14 |
to mark procmail in any way. ~x86 should be able to apply patches on |
15 |
their own, or wait until the patch arrives in tree. |
16 |
|
17 |
Sebastian |
18 |
|
19 |
-- |
20 |
" Religion ist das Opium des Volkes. " | _ ASCII ribbon campaign |
21 |
Karl Marx | ( ) against HTML e-mail |
22 |
SEB@STI@N GÜNTHER | X against M$ attachments |
23 |
mailto:samson@××××××××××××××××.de | / \ www.asciiribbon.org |