Gentoo Archives: gentoo-user

From: "Sebastian Günther" <samson@××××××××××××××××.de>
To: gentoo-user@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] About procmail and getline
Date: Sun, 14 Jun 2009 16:57:57
Message-Id: 20090614165753.GB12492@marvin.heimnetz.local
In Reply to: [gentoo-user] About procmail and getline by Harry Putnam
1 * Harry Putnam (reader@×××××××.com) [12.06.09 16:41]:
2 >
3 > There is a patch offered but still one would think using standard
4 > emerge on a package that is outside the `~' daredevil stage and is not
5 > masked, it should `just work' [tm].
6 >
7 >
8
9 When I read the bug rightfully, procmail did not build with glibc
10 2.10.1, which is *not* stable yet, especially because of a lot packages
11 which don't build cleanly with it at the moment.
12
13 So if you'd use the stable glibc it would build fine. There is no need
14 to mark procmail in any way. ~x86 should be able to apply patches on
15 their own, or wait until the patch arrives in tree.
16
17 Sebastian
18
19 --
20 " Religion ist das Opium des Volkes. " | _ ASCII ribbon campaign
21 Karl Marx | ( ) against HTML e-mail
22 SEB@STI@N GÜNTHER | X against M$ attachments
23 mailto:samson@××××××××××××××××.de | / \ www.asciiribbon.org

Replies

Subject Author
[gentoo-user] Re: About procmail and getline Harry Putnam <reader@×××××××.com>
[gentoo-user] Re: About procmail and getline Harry Putnam <reader@×××××××.com>