1 |
On 31 Aug 2010, at 01:31, Allan Gottlieb wrote: |
2 |
|
3 |
> Jake Moe <jakesaddress@×××××.com> writes: |
4 |
> |
5 |
>> On 31/08/10 06:57, Allan Gottlieb wrote: |
6 |
>>> I plugged into the desktop and looked on the laptop. |
7 |
>>> |
8 |
>>> Sorry for the noise, |
9 |
>>> allan |
10 |
>>> |
11 |
>> Whups, only looked at the previous thread, didn't see this. Probably |
12 |
>> best if you reply to the thread with stuff like this, so we can keep |
13 |
>> track of it. |
14 |
> |
15 |
> I thought of that. The problem is that there is quite a delay between |
16 |
> my sending the msg and seeing it appear in the newsgroup. |
17 |
> I wanted to tell people right away to prevent wasted effort. |
18 |
> |
19 |
> Perhaps I should have "replied" to my local copy (gnus GCC), but then |
20 |
> the references would not be right in the newsgroup. |
21 |
|
22 |
Replying to the copy in your sent items should cause the reply to show |
23 |
properly in thread. |
24 |
|
25 |
The recipients' mail client should thread based the Message-Id: and |
26 |
References: headers. |
27 |
|
28 |
I paused before clicking send on this message, thinking that the |
29 |
Message-Id: might be added by your mail server, however looking in my |
30 |
sent items I find it to be added by the client (or by my client, at |
31 |
least) and a grep finds this header to be preserved when the message |
32 |
arrived to the list. |
33 |
|
34 |
Stroller. |