1 |
On 12/11/2017 13:47, Neil Bothwick wrote: |
2 |
> On Sun, 12 Nov 2017 10:55:04 +0000, Akater wrote: |
3 |
> |
4 |
>> It looks like systemd scripts often (always?) get installed, regardless |
5 |
>> of USE flag settings. |
6 |
> |
7 |
> Because they are tiny so impact of them is negligible. On the other hand, |
8 |
> if you don't have them and want to switch to systemd, you would end up |
9 |
> having to recompile half of world just to get the service files. |
10 |
> |
11 |
>> Why would they? Is this a policy? |
12 |
> |
13 |
> AFAIK, yes. |
14 |
> |
15 |
> If you really want to do this, you can do it with INSTALL_MASK in |
16 |
> make.conf. |
17 |
|
18 |
but you have to ask yourself, why bother even with that? |
19 |
|
20 |
Yes, I know there are some Lennart haters around who refuse under any |
21 |
circumstances to ever have anything on a computer that might in any way |
22 |
be tainted by Lennart, no matter how tangentially. |
23 |
|
24 |
But that's just daft. No-one complains about /usr/share/doc and the |
25 |
large number of docs there, many of which are larger than all the |
26 |
systemd unit files combined. Or what multilib setups end up doing in /lib |
27 |
|
28 |
It makes engineering sense to install all the various init system's unit |
29 |
and scripts for all packages, then the sysadmin gets to pick which one |
30 |
is in use. |
31 |
|
32 |
-- |
33 |
Alan McKinnon |
34 |
alan.mckinnon@×××××.com |