Gentoo Archives: gentoo-user

From: Harry Putnam <reader@×××××××.com>
To: gentoo-user@l.g.o
Subject: [gentoo-user] Re: Don't understand downgrade to kernel-3.2.16
Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2012 02:00:34
Message-Id: 87ehpcnjun.fsf@newsguy.com
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Don't understand downgrade to kernel-3.2.16 by Michael Hampicke
1 Michael Hampicke <gentoo-user@××××.biz> writes:
2
3 >>> I'd say you still have a slotted package of gentoo-sources-3.2.*
4 >>> installed. So portage will upgrade gentoo-sources-3.2.* and
5 >>> gentoo-sources-3.3.*
6 >>>
7 >>> Check with emerge -p --prune gentoo-sources
8
9 What I had installed was 3.2.6... so why would emerge want to install
10 something older? (3.2.16) I don't get that.
11
12 But anyway I let the prune command run, removing 3.2.6 I then
13 manually removed /lib/modules/3.2.6 and what was left of /usr/src/linux-3.2.6
14
15 eix now shows that 3.3.4 is the only kernel installed,
16
17 eix -Ic gentoo-sources
18
19 ,----
20 | # eix -Ic gentoo-sources [D] sys-kernel/gentoo-sources
21 | (3.3.4(3.3.4)@04/29/12 -> 3.0.17-r2(3.0.17-r2)^bs
22 | (~)3.0.33(3.0.33)^bs 3.1.10-r1(3.1.10-r1)^bs 3.2.1-r2(3.2.1-r2)^bs
23 | 3.2.12(3.2.12)^bs (~)3.2.14(3.2.14)^bs (~)3.2.16(3.2.16)^bs): Full
24 | sources including the Gentoo patchset for the 3.4 kernel tree
25 `----
26
27 But still the last line of output from: emerge -vuDp world:
28
29 ,----
30 | [ebuild NS ] sys-kernel/gentoo-sources-3.2.16 [3.3.4] USE="-build
31 | -deblob -symlink" 322 kB
32 `----
33
34 I guess I'm still a bit confused.

Replies

Subject Author
[gentoo-user] Re: Don't understand downgrade to kernel-3.2.16 Harry Putnam <reader@×××××××.com>