1 |
On 2010-11-25, Helmut Jarausch <jarausch@××××××××××××××××.de> wrote: |
2 |
|
3 |
> I'd suggest SystemRescueCD. |
4 |
|
5 |
That was my first thought, but it's not going to |
6 |
|
7 |
> It's upgraded quite often (currently using kernel 2.6.35-x) has a |
8 |
> ready to go X11 environment and most useful, it's an up-to-date |
9 |
> Gentoo system, so one immediately knows where to look if there are |
10 |
> any problems. And it has a well documented (easy) procedure for |
11 |
> extending it. |
12 |
|
13 |
But, I'm going to have to speed up the boot time considerably: |
14 |
|
15 |
>> I thought about using a customized systemrescuecd, but that takes |
16 |
>> ages to boot (almost 5 minutes). This CD is intended as something a |
17 |
>> customer can run to do a quick hardware test, and making them sit |
18 |
>> there for 5 minutes to see a 5-second test just isn't going to fly. |
19 |
|
20 |
The current version of the liveCD I'm attempting to replace boots in |
21 |
about 10 seconds on the same machine that takes 5 minutes to boot |
22 |
systemrescue CD. Slowing the boot time that much isn't going to be |
23 |
acceptable. I'm trying to figure out ways to speed up systemrescuecd. |
24 |
|
25 |
I may ditch the squashfs stuff entirely and run from the initrd |
26 |
filesystem. It looks like that should save a minute or two. |
27 |
|
28 |
After that I'm going to try disabling Networking and most block device |
29 |
(IDE, PATA, floppy, SCSI, and SATA) support. |
30 |
|
31 |
-- |
32 |
Grant |