1 |
On Sun, Nov 10, 2013 at 04:07:34PM -0600, Dale wrote: |
2 |
|
3 |
> >> I have noticed something that really bugs me. I sometimes have a few |
4 |
> >> Firefox sessions running. I do this because I have to be logged into a |
5 |
> >> website with more than one user/password. Here is my issue. If I click |
6 |
> >> the X box to close a session of Firefox, it doesn't seem to kill the |
7 |
> >> process. [...] |
8 |
|
9 |
> > What version of Firefox? What addons (if any) do you use with Firefox? |
10 |
|
11 |
> Oh good heavens. I have lots of add ons installed. It would take me a |
12 |
> while to list them all, heck, just to get a list much list post them |
13 |
> here. |
14 |
|
15 |
There’s an addon for that. ;-) |
16 |
But if you start like that, I would recommend to thin out the list. You |
17 |
never know what kind of conflicts and other interactions there might be |
18 |
between addons. We could discuss this in another thread. ;-) |
19 |
|
20 |
> lol I recall abduction, tab utilities, last pass off the top of |
21 |
> my head. However, I have a test session that has very very few add ons |
22 |
> and it does the same way. |
23 |
|
24 |
With session you mean firefox profile? I know of no other way of having |
25 |
different sets of addons simultaneously (short of Walter’s idea of using |
26 |
different unix users). |
27 |
|
28 |
> Also, I run into this with other processes as well. It seems to me |
29 |
> that some package or the kernel is not killing processes as it should. |
30 |
> I just don't know what that is. |
31 |
|
32 |
What processes? If it’s Seamonkey which you mentioned elsewhere, it may |
33 |
be the same problem/cause. |
34 |
You could possibly identify the perpetrating process by looking at its |
35 |
memory footprint. A process that is close to terminating would use much |
36 |
less memory than a fully running process with tabs. |
37 |
|
38 |
> It could even be a KDE bug. |
39 |
|
40 |
I don’t really think so. You click the X, the window manager notifies |
41 |
the program in the window to quit. The program destroys its X client, |
42 |
KWin processes that event and poof. Nothing more KDE can do (IMHO). |
43 |
|
44 |
> I know when I go to boot runlevel, I have to kill quite a few |
45 |
> processes that are pretty stubborn to kill. kill -15 usually doesn't |
46 |
> work so I end up using -9 to get it to die. |
47 |
|
48 |
If you go to *that* length (switch to boot and kill processes manually), |
49 |
why not do the *cough* Ubuntu way and simply reboot, since killing X |
50 |
means killing most of your environment of running applications anyway? |
51 |
-- |
52 |
Gruß | Greetings | Qapla’ |
53 |
Please do not share anything from, with or about me with any Facebook service. |
54 |
|
55 |
The total intelligence on a planet is constant. Population grows... |