| 1 |
On Saturday 27 December 2014 09:43:47 Peter Humphrey wrote: |
| 2 |
> Morning list, |
| 3 |
> |
| 4 |
> Is there a way to build KDE without its concept of Activities? I find it an |
| 5 |
> unnecessary complication, which I never use. Any time I found myself |
| 6 |
> wrestling with it by accident it's caused little other than anger and |
| 7 |
> frustration. |
| 8 |
> |
| 9 |
> No doubt this is just as silly an idea as building KMail without its |
| 10 |
> database, which also has caused considerable grief. |
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
+1 |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
Don't understand it. Don't want to. Really hate when I press the wrong |
| 15 |
button, it does some crazy inscrutable bullshit, and I have to figure out how |
| 16 |
to escape from it with my desktop intact. |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
Probably I just want to check my email, or whatever, and all of a sudden, it's |
| 19 |
like some ridiculous bridge troll is posing riddles to me and threatening to |
| 20 |
blow up my desktop if I answer wrong. |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
After quickly ducking this, I'm not optimistic. This is particularly |
| 23 |
discouraging: https://forum.kde.org/viewtopic.php?f=67&t=91160 |
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
Sounds an awful lot like the cashew/virtuoso/etc. If history is any guide, |
| 26 |
they'll never change it, no matter how nicely we ask, nor how carefully we |
| 27 |
construct the patches to make it optional. |
| 28 |
|
| 29 |
-gmt |
Archives