1 |
Florian Philipp wrote: |
2 |
> Am Montag 30 Juli 2007 13:53 schrieb Dale: |
3 |
> |
4 |
>> Florian Philipp wrote: |
5 |
>> |
6 |
>>> Just as a side note: It is not very wise to choose reiserfs for /boot. We |
7 |
>>> had a topic about it some time ago. On such a small partition the journal |
8 |
>>> eats up a lot of space (32MB with default settings). |
9 |
>>> |
10 |
>> I'm not sure the math is 100% correct but it has to be close. I agree, |
11 |
>> you should not use reiserfs for /boot, unless it is going to be a big |
12 |
>> one. lol |
13 |
>> |
14 |
>> |
15 |
>>> Filesystem 1K-blocks Used Available Use% Mounted on |
16 |
>>> /dev/hda1 195508 43440 152068 23% /boot |
17 |
>>> |
18 |
>>> root@smoker / # du -sh /boot/ |
19 |
>>> 11M /boot/ |
20 |
>>> root@smoker / # |
21 |
>>> |
22 |
>> 43Mb according to df and only 11Mb according to du. Looks like about |
23 |
>> 32Mb or so. See, learn from a idiot that did it. ;-) |
24 |
>> |
25 |
>> Dale |
26 |
>> |
27 |
>> :-) :-) :-) |
28 |
>> |
29 |
> |
30 |
> I just looked into the man page of mkreiserfs: |
31 |
> |
32 |
> default blocksize: 4096 byte |
33 |
> default jounal size: 8193 blocks |
34 |
> |
35 |
> 4096 bytes/block * 8193 blocks / 1024^2 = 32.003906 MiB |
36 |
> |
37 |
|
38 |
It's not 100% but pretty darn close. ;-) Like you said earlier, you |
39 |
shouldn't use reiserfs for small partitions like /boot. |
40 |
|
41 |
Signed, |
42 |
|
43 |
The Idiot. LOL |
44 |
|
45 |
:-) :-) |