| 1 |
On Mon, Apr 4, 2011 at 7:16 AM, James <wireless@×××××××××××.com> wrote: |
| 2 |
> Mark Shields <laebshade <at> gmail.com> writes: |
| 3 |
> |
| 4 |
> |
| 5 |
>> The last guide recommends using raid0 on some |
| 6 |
>> partitions; everytime I use LVM2, I use nothing |
| 7 |
>> but raid1 partitions. I'd rather have the full |
| 8 |
>> raid1 than partial raid 1 + speed of raid0. |
| 9 |
> |
| 10 |
> |
| 11 |
> Well Raid 1 only would be keen. |
| 12 |
> Even swap as raid 1 ? |
| 13 |
> |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
The kernel does it's own management of swap. If you use swap at all |
| 16 |
I'd let the kernel manage that itself and not get in the middle with |
| 17 |
RAID. |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
- Mark |
Archives