| 1 |
Dale wrote: |
| 2 |
> Walter Dnes wrote: |
| 3 |
> |
| 4 |
>> I just did an "emerge --sync" followed by an ask fetchonly, which I |
| 5 |
>> do to avoid unpleasant surprises. Emerge is sending the following |
| 6 |
>> message to stderr. I don't like the concept of masking out stuff for an |
| 7 |
>> ordinary emerge. Any idea what gives? |
| 8 |
>> |
| 9 |
>> < SNIP > |
| 10 |
>> |
| 11 |
>> |
| 12 |
>> |
| 13 |
>> |
| 14 |
> |
| 15 |
> Ditto. ummmm, +1 or whatever. Basically, same thing here. You are not |
| 16 |
> alone. |
| 17 |
> |
| 18 |
> Dale |
| 19 |
> |
| 20 |
> :-) :-) |
| 21 |
> |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
OK. No response here so after tonights sync, I had only one blocker. I |
| 24 |
added it to package.keywords and it was off to the races. So Walter, |
| 25 |
you may want to sync again and see if it is any better. |
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
I guess we just caught something out of "sync". LOL |
| 28 |
|
| 29 |
Dale |
| 30 |
|
| 31 |
:-) :-) |
Archives