| 1 |
On Thursday, 28 October 2021 21:54:50 GMT Jack wrote: |
| 2 |
> > On Thursday, 21 October 2021 17:11:27 BST Peter Humphrey wrote: |
| 3 |
> > > Hello list, |
| 4 |
> > > |
| 5 |
> > > I wanted to try this package to create a small site for myself, but |
| 6 |
> > |
| 7 |
> > I'm |
| 8 |
> > |
| 9 |
> > > falling at the second hurdle (the first was setting package.env etc |
| 10 |
> > |
| 11 |
> > to pull |
| 12 |
> > |
| 13 |
> > > in ruby26 as well as the currently installed ruby30). |
| 14 |
> > > |
| 15 |
> > > Does anyone have experience with this builder? I'd like to find out |
| 16 |
> > |
| 17 |
> > where |
| 18 |
> > |
| 19 |
> > > I'm going wrong first. |
| 20 |
> |
| 21 |
> I just noticed something which may or may not help. The jekyllrb.com |
| 22 |
> docs page, under Prerequisites, says Ruby version 2.5.0 or higher. Why |
| 23 |
> does the ebuild insist on 2.5 (no longer even in the tree) or 2.6. If |
| 24 |
> I were going to install it, the first thing I'd probably do is make a |
| 25 |
> copy in my local overlay, and allow a newer version of ruby. I don't |
| 26 |
> think that is likely to help with your problem of not finding one thing |
| 27 |
> or another, but who knows? (A note lower down on that page says that |
| 28 |
> using ruby 3.0.0 or higher add a requirement for webrick, but that is |
| 29 |
> available in portage, and could be handled in the ebuild. |
| 30 |
|
| 31 |
I can't see any future in trying to get Jekyll going on Gentoo, so I'm trying |
| 32 |
another tack: Kubuntu. Now I'm falling foul of VirtualBox, in particular its |
| 33 |
guest additions, which won't compile. Bug 814197 refers. |
| 34 |
|
| 35 |
So maybe it's time to try dual-boot. |
| 36 |
|
| 37 |
-- |
| 38 |
Regards, |
| 39 |
Peter. |
Archives