Gentoo Archives: gentoo-user

From: Marc Joliet <marcec@×××.de>
To: gentoo-user@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] virtual/pam masked but required by all non-hardened profiles?
Date: Tue, 15 Oct 2019 15:01:25
Message-Id: 1982568.pEAuoRReTl@thetick
In Reply to: [gentoo-user] virtual/pam masked but required by all non-hardened profiles? by Grant Edwards
1 Am Montag, 14. Oktober 2019, 17:26:32 CEST schrieb Grant Edwards:
2 > This morning emerge is complaining that virtual/pam-0-r1 is masked and
3 > scheduled for removal in 14 days. But virtual/pam is required by
4 > sys-apps/shadow which is part of the base profiles.
5 >
6 > What am I missing?
7
8 FYI: The mask has been reverted, so people should stop seeing this message:
9
10 https://gitweb.gentoo.org/repo/gentoo.git/commit/?
11 id=ab207de832114e7440c93e128b50ff2d58324d6a
12
13 (The problem was that the dependency changes I mentioned were in part done
14 without a corresponding revbump, meaning portage would not pick them up by
15 itself :-/ .)
16
17 Greetings
18 --
19 Marc Joliet
20 --
21 "People who think they know everything really annoy those of us who know we
22 don't" - Bjarne Stroustrup

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature