| 1 |
On Sun, 24 Apr 2016 17:11:54 +0000 (UTC) |
| 2 |
James <wireless@×××××××××××.com> wrote: |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
> Victor <victor <at> enise.org> writes: |
| 5 |
> |
| 6 |
> |
| 7 |
> > I have a couple of ebuilds for some software not in main tree, |
| 8 |
> > mainly emacs and python modules. |
| 9 |
> > What is the preferred way to contribute them without becoming a |
| 10 |
> > Gentoo Developer? |
| 11 |
> |
| 12 |
> I think the preferred method (it takes time to go down the gentoo-dev |
| 13 |
> or gentoo-proxy-maintainer pathways) is to setup a github acccount |
| 14 |
> and post your body of work there because github makes it easy for |
| 15 |
> folks to collaborate with you and your work. |
| 16 |
> |
| 17 |
> [...] |
| 18 |
> |
| 19 |
> > Should I post them to bugzilla or maybe send to `python' and `emacs' |
| 20 |
> > overlays (if so, how?), or `sunrise' overlay? Or create my own |
| 21 |
> > overlay? |
| 22 |
> |
| 23 |
> Yes, that way, we get immediate access to the ebuilds to test them |
| 24 |
> out and give you feedback. Put up some details, related to these |
| 25 |
> packages, either in bgo or a github/blog, particularly if they are |
| 26 |
> part of a theme you are pursuing. |
| 27 |
|
| 28 |
Thanks. |
| 29 |
|
| 30 |
> Who knows, maybe you'll also want to bring turbogears2 to gentoo? |
| 31 |
> That would be very, bery cool! Turbogears1 use to be part of the |
| 32 |
> packages available. Turbogears2 is very cool [1]. |
| 33 |
|
| 34 |
I've never used turbogears, I'll take a note :) |
Archives