| 1 |
On 24.02.2014 22:55, Mark David Dumlao wrote: |
| 2 |
[...] |
| 3 |
> |
| 4 |
> I didn't attribute anything to you you didn't say. It just so happens, though |
| 5 |
> that there is a context to this conversation, which, if you ignore, just |
| 6 |
> tends to perpetuate a lot of confusion. I am responding to questions and |
| 7 |
> points in that context for the benefit of the larger conversation, not |
| 8 |
> just for you. |
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
I'll be short. |
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
You also ignored much of what I asked, and tend to answer "that's |
| 13 |
besides the point" to things which IMO matter. |
| 14 |
If you are responding to my post, then I'm expecting you to be replying |
| 15 |
to me, rather than to the benefit of the larger conversation, if you |
| 16 |
didn't say otherwise. ;-) |
| 17 |
As for the context, I was answering to Alan's ``I've been wondering |
| 18 |
about this concept of "the*nix design principles"... `` which (as well |
| 19 |
as my answer) didn't mention systemd and openrc at all. |
| 20 |
In this thread, there's already a rattling mixture of contexts. I'm |
| 21 |
opting out of it, because I no longer see the benefit of the larger |
| 22 |
conversation here. |
| 23 |
Nevertheless, thank you for your time and answers. |
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
-- |
| 26 |
Best wishes, |
| 27 |
Yuri K. Shatroff |
Archives