1 |
On Friday 14 March 2008, Mark Knecht wrote: |
2 |
> It's an interesting question and one I've not tried to test. Does an |
3 |
> AMD64 machine running a 32-bit or 64-bit install run faster or slower |
4 |
> with one or the other. |
5 |
|
6 |
Simple logic dictates that 32 and 64 apps will *generally* run at |
7 |
exactly the same speed, mostly because the amd64 arch is x86 with 64 |
8 |
bit extensions. Unless your app is compiled to actually use the 64 bit |
9 |
features (you'd be surprised just how few are), 32 and 64 bit code |
10 |
tends to run at exactly the same speed using exactly the same opcodes |
11 |
at exactly the same clock rate. |
12 |
|
13 |
For any app not using intensive 64 bit arithmetic (super-duper math/sci |
14 |
stuff and seriously intensive graphics are the only ones I can think of |
15 |
off-hand) it's hard to see a benefit for amd64 with current desktop |
16 |
memory loads. |
17 |
|
18 |
The real benefit of amd64 becomes very obvious when you are dealing with |
19 |
apps that consume huge amounts of memory and 3G of addressable space |
20 |
for all apps just doesn't cut it. This is the problem amd64 was |
21 |
primarily designed to solve. When you have an app that does benefit |
22 |
from amd64 - like Sybase IQ just to pull a random selection from a |
23 |
hat :-) the difference is astounding. |
24 |
|
25 |
Conventional desktops? Never seen a benefit yet on a normal desktop. |
26 |
|
27 |
-- |
28 |
Alan McKinnon |
29 |
alan dot mckinnon at gmail dot com |
30 |
|
31 |
-- |
32 |
gentoo-user@l.g.o mailing list |