Archives
Archives
| From: | Pandu Poluan <pandu@××××××.info> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-user <Gentoo-user@l.g.o> | ||
| Subject: | [gentoo-user] Re: "net-firewall/xtables-addons" issues | ||
| Date: | Fri, 02 Mar 2012 10:39:30 | ||
| Message-Id: | CAA2qdGUj8fyv12PGt0map5U+inT1DgizrxjVfz95Q70EHVyPvg@mail.gmail.com | ||
| In Reply to: | [gentoo-user] "net-firewall/xtables-addons" issues by Pandu Poluan |
||
| 1 | Silly me... |
| 2 | |
| 3 | On Fri, Mar 2, 2012 at 17:23, Pandu Poluan <pandu@××××××.info> wrote: |
| 4 | > |
| 5 | > 1. Should I file a bugreport for xtables-addons-1.39? |
| 6 | > |
| 7 | > 2. Or should I request for xtables-addons-1.41 in the portage tree? |
| 8 | > |
| 9 | > |
| 10 | > [1] http://sourceforge.net/projects/xtables-addons/files/Xtables-addons/ |
| 11 | > |
| 12 | > |
| 13 | |
| 14 | Upstream's 1.41 already incorporated the necessary fixes for |
| 15 | xtables-addons to be compilable on kernel 3.2/3.3: |
| 16 | |
| 17 | http://xtables-addons.git.sourceforge.net/git/gitweb.cgi?p=xtables-addons/xtables-addons;a=commitdiff;h=076610e3af86b4b3f87f9c7811d36e38ec8a39cd |
| 18 | |
| 19 | So there's just one question: Why haven't the package maintainer pull |
| 20 | xtables-addons-1.41 into the portage tree? |
| 21 | |
| 22 | Rgds |
| 23 | -- |
| 24 | FdS Pandu E Poluan |
| 25 | ~ IT Optimizer ~ |
| 26 | |
| 27 | • LOPSA Member #15248 |
| 28 | • Blog : http://pepoluan.tumblr.com |
| 29 | • Linked-In : http://id.linkedin.com/in/pepoluan |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| [gentoo-user] Re: "net-firewall/xtables-addons" issues | Pandu Poluan <pandu@××××××.info> |