| 1 |
Mark Kirkwood wrote: |
| 2 |
> Ow Mun Heng wrote: |
| 3 |
>> |
| 4 |
>> I've already updated it to the latest based on the suspend2 version. |
| 5 |
>> $uname -r |
| 6 |
>> 2.6.17-suspend2-r4 |
| 7 |
>> |
| 8 |
>> $eix xfsprogs |
| 9 |
>> Available versions: 2.7.3 2.7.11 2.8.10 |
| 10 |
>> Installed: 2.8.10 |
| 11 |
>> |
| 12 |
>> |
| 13 |
>> If not mistaken, the issue, (or barriers if not mistaken) was introduced |
| 14 |
>> in the 2.6.17 kernel series. |
| 15 |
>> the 2.6.16 series wasn't affected. (I could be wrong, I don't have net |
| 16 |
>> access so, I can't verify) |
| 17 |
>> |
| 18 |
> |
| 19 |
> Right - as it happens I'm doing an update today, so will let you know if |
| 20 |
> I see any write performance change. |
| 21 |
> |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
FWIW, I've updated to 2.6.17 and I don't see any change in performance |
| 25 |
at all (215Mb/s reads and 100Mb/s writes). |
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
Now I'm on the standard source tree: |
| 28 |
|
| 29 |
$ uname -r |
| 30 |
2.6.17-gentoo-r7 |
| 31 |
|
| 32 |
$ eix xfsprogs |
| 33 |
Available versions: 2.7.3 2.7.11 ~2.8.10 |
| 34 |
Installed: 2.7.11 |
| 35 |
|
| 36 |
which may be a factor. |
| 37 |
|
| 38 |
The other thing I notice is that my filesystems are all under 50%, |
| 39 |
whereas your troublesome one was at 80%or so: |
| 40 |
|
| 41 |
$ df -m |
| 42 |
Filesystem 1M-blocks Used Available Use% Mounted on |
| 43 |
/dev/md/2 529 134 395 26% / |
| 44 |
/dev/md/0 129 10 120 8% /boot |
| 45 |
/dev/md/3 3911 32 3880 1% /tmp |
| 46 |
/dev/md/4 3911 175 3737 5% /var |
| 47 |
/dev/md/5 19537 3008 16530 16% /usr |
| 48 |
/dev/md/6 19537 2668 16870 14% /home |
| 49 |
/dev/md/7 104841 25682 79160 25% /data0 |
| 50 |
|
| 51 |
I might try writing a few big files to fill one of 'em up and see if it |
| 52 |
makes any difference! |
| 53 |
|
| 54 |
Cheers |
| 55 |
|
| 56 |
Mark |
| 57 |
-- |
| 58 |
gentoo-user@g.o mailing list |
Archives