1 |
On Monday, 5 April 2021 19:43:29 BST Neil Bothwick wrote: |
2 |
> On Mon, 5 Apr 2021 19:04:18 +0100, antlists wrote: |
3 |
> > > For the uninitiated, the difference here is that olddefconfig will |
4 |
> > > accept the default configuration value for any new/changed options, |
5 |
> > > whereas oldconfig will prompt the user for input. |
6 |
> > > |
7 |
> > > The former is great if you just don't care and want to accept the |
8 |
> > > default, but it isn't right for every user. |
9 |
> > |
10 |
> > fwiw, I think I've always just copied the old .config across, then done |
11 |
> > "make menuconfig". I think that also just accepts defaults for anything |
12 |
> > new. |
13 |
> |
14 |
> It doesn't, it prompts for every change, with the default preselected. |
15 |
|
16 |
Eh? Did you read 'oldconfig' where 'menuconfig' was written? |
17 |
|
18 |
> It's more time consuming than running make olddefconfig but it does give |
19 |
> you the chance to see what the new options are, and read the help if you |
20 |
> need more. |
21 |
|
22 |
|
23 |
-- |
24 |
Regards, |
25 |
Peter. |