| 1 |
On Tue, Nov 22, 2011 at 16:40, Joerg Schilling |
| 2 |
<Joerg.Schilling@××××××××××××××××.de> wrote: |
| 3 |
> Pandu Poluan <pandu@××××××.info> wrote: |
| 4 |
> |
| 5 |
>> On Tue, Nov 22, 2011 at 10:26, Adam Carter <adamcarter3@×××××.com> wrote: |
| 6 |
>> >>> sed -r -e 's/(.*)-[0-9].*/\1/' |
| 7 |
>> >> |
| 8 |
>> >> You know, that looks familiar... are you trying to get a package name from |
| 9 |
>> >> the list of eix-installed? :-) |
| 10 |
>> > |
| 11 |
>> > No - its non-gentoo. In this case it hasn't worked |
| 12 |
>> > |
| 13 |
>> > $ echo net-snmp-5.3.2.2-5.cp843034001.i386.rpm | sed -r -e 's/(.*)-[0-9].*/\1/' |
| 14 |
>> > net-snmp-5.3.2.2 |
| 15 |
>> > |
| 16 |
>> |
| 17 |
>> Ah, yes. sed's greedy regex again messes up the plan >.< |
| 18 |
>> |
| 19 |
>> Here's an alternative: |
| 20 |
>> |
| 21 |
>> sed -r -e 's/-[0-9].*//' |
| 22 |
> |
| 23 |
> Nust a note: sed has no option -r and 's/(.*)-[0-9].*/\1/' is a "garbled" |
| 24 |
> command. A corrected version would be 's/\(.*\)-[0-9].*/\1/' |
| 25 |
> |
| 26 |
> So the main question is: why do you use a non-existing option? |
| 27 |
> |
| 28 |
|
| 29 |
# sed --help |
| 30 |
|
| 31 |
Usage: sed [OPTION]... {script-only-if-no-other-script} [input-file]... |
| 32 |
|
| 33 |
----- >8 snip |
| 34 |
|
| 35 |
-r, --regexp-extended |
| 36 |
use extended regular expressions in the script. |
| 37 |
|
| 38 |
----- >8 snip |
| 39 |
|
| 40 |
|
| 41 |
Rgds, |
| 42 |
-- |
| 43 |
FdS Pandu E Poluan |
| 44 |
~ IT Optimizer ~ |
| 45 |
|
| 46 |
• LOPSA Member #15248 |
| 47 |
• Blog : http://pepoluan.tumblr.com |
| 48 |
• Linked-In : http://id.linkedin.com/in/pepoluan |
Archives