Gentoo Archives: gentoo-user

From: James Stevenson <james.al.stevenson@×××××.com>
To: gentoo-user@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: You removed Weboob package over political reasons? Whole Internet laughs at you
Date: Mon, 24 Dec 2018 15:23:48
Message-Id: CAJPAcrOZ1_Q8p84Gr0HP1319vA-HsQXMj-Ck1aZDukb3J7S9Bg@mail.gmail.com
In Reply to: [gentoo-user] Re: You removed Weboob package over political reasons? Whole Internet laughs at you by vsnsdualce@memeware.net
1 Holy cow! Didn't realise I was subscribed to the OpenBSD mailing list.
2
3 On Mon, Dec 24, 2018, 3:18 PM <vsnsdualce@××××××××.net wrote:
4
5 > Debian is not ruled by the men who actually write the software, but
6 > instead women.
7 > Just like in all the anglo-american conquered world.
8 >
9 > We, the men who actually do work, are treated as the same worker-slaves
10 > everywhere.
11 >
12 > Opensource was a refuge from the worthless cunts (who ban us from having
13 > anything good, such as cute young child brides (allowed by YHWH))
14 > but has not been for some time now. Part and parcel of anglo culture:
15 > the man is a dog, the wwuuuummmannn is a Noble.
16 >
17 > Now that Linus has caved all is lost.
18 >
19 > But you can always rescind license for your copyrighted works...
20 > (as-long as they are a bare license such as the gpl2).
21 >
22 > Absent an attached interest (ie: someone paying you for use of the work,
23 > or relying on your promises): you the rightsholder have the right to
24 > rescind at will.
25 > GPL v2 lacks such language disclaiming rescission, you made no
26 > utterances that one could rely upon to suggest
27 > that there would be no rescission, and you were paid no consideration
28 > for your work.
29 > .: You can rescind, just like any other property license.
30 >
31 > And yes, I am a lawyer.
32 >
33 > Men should be free to take girl children as brides and feminism should
34 > be eliminated from the earth
35 > (just as they seek to eliminate all pro-male cultures in the world)
36 >
37 > On 2018-12-24 14:58, Default User wrote:
38 > > On Mon, Dec 24, 2018, 05:20 Ivan Ivanov <qmastery16@×××××.com wrote:
39 > >
40 > >>> 500 comments at Slashdot, >200 at Phoronix and >1000 at linux org
41 > >> ru! See now?
42 > >> When a technical project starts making their decisions over
43 > >> political reasons...
44 > >> rather than technical, it is doomed. Good time to switch to a
45 > >> similar distro....
46 > >> with mentally sane leadership, like Devuan. Also what's good about
47 > >> Devuan :
48 > >>
49 > >> Devuan does not use SystemDick as its' init system! SystemD contains
50 > >>> 1 million
51 > >> lines of bloated code and lots of vulnerabilities have been found
52 > >> there and
53 > >> countless haven't, also the SystemD creators are arrogant and refuse
54 > >> to fix many
55 > >> discovered security vulnerabilities, to a point where they've been
56 > >> awarded a
57 > >> " Pwnie award " for refusing to fix a critical vuln.
58 > >>
59 > >> That is why I prefer the distros which are using something else as
60 > >> init system:
61 > >> either good old SysV, or something more modern like OpenRC (at Artix
62 > >> Linux) or
63 > >> runit (at Void Linux) , just not systemd! There are only a few such
64 > >> distros left
65 > >> because of Redhat pressure, and luckily Devuan is one of them.
66 > >> If you found Debian as useful before it went nuts then maybe you'd
67 > >> like Devuan,
68 > >> or even some other distros that I mentioned: Artix Linux =Arch with
69 > >> a human face
70 > >> (has GUI + everything configured by default, nice GUI package
71 > >> manager and
72 > >> convenient to use even for the beginners), and Void Linux -amazingly
73 > >> fast distro
74 > >> really suitable for old PCs, but lacks some packages so you'd need
75 > >> to compile
76 > >> the things from source once in a while, in comparison Artix has
77 > >> almost the same
78 > >> set of packages as Arch. Both Artix and Void are very stable despite
79 > >> their
80 > >> packages are really new and they are among the first to get new
81 > >> Linux kernels
82 > >> with fresh drivers.
83 > >>
84 > >> Or maybe MX Linux, one of the top popularity distros nowadays which
85 > >> is
86 > >> also "no systemd" and somehow only recently I learned about it
87 > >>
88 > >> Best regards,
89 > >> Ivan Ivanov,
90 > >> open source firmware developer
91 > >
92 > > How ridiculous that some pathetic questionable would spend their
93 > > precious time on Earth censoring package names which contain the
94 > > character string "boob".
95 > >
96 > > Sad.
97 > >
98 > >>
99 >
100 >