| 1 |
On Wednesday 11 Nov 2015 20:46:45 Neil Bothwick wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Wed, 11 Nov 2015 13:07:20 -0700, thelma@×××××××××××.com wrote: |
| 3 |
> > >> Is "www-client/chromium" good alternative to firefox? |
| 4 |
> > > |
| 5 |
> > > I much prefer it, but that's all it is, personal preference. Try it |
| 6 |
> > > and decide for yourself. It's a long emerge so you may want to try |
| 7 |
> > > with chrome first, it's a binary package so much faster to install. |
| 8 |
> > |
| 9 |
> > I was just checking out on other forums; chromium is an open source and |
| 10 |
> > not very well maintain. www-client/google-chrome suppose to be better. |
| 11 |
> |
| 12 |
> On what is that claim based? Chromium used the chrome source code with |
| 13 |
> the proprietary bits removed and the same versions of both are available |
| 14 |
> in portage. |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
...and I'm for ever having to recompile chromium as it seems to change about |
| 17 |
once a week. Not what you would call poorly supported. |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
-- |
| 20 |
Rgds |
| 21 |
Peter |
Archives