| 1 |
On Fri, Jun 03, 2011 at 09:20:01AM +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote: |
| 2 |
> |
| 3 |
> Compare how Google goes about doing things with how Adobe does it. |
| 4 |
> |
| 5 |
> The Google Chromium team appears to take security seriously and are open and |
| 6 |
> up-front about what they do. |
| 7 |
> |
| 8 |
> Adobe likes to stonewall on issues and create an aura of how sekrit stuff is. |
| 9 |
> |
| 10 |
> Which one inspires confidence in fellow geeks? |
| 11 |
> |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
Neither. Adobe is utterly incompetent and apathetic, google is evil |
| 14 |
and wants to sell ad space for h3rb41 v14gr4 in your brain. |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
Flash is a necessary evil for a lot of us, chrome(ium) is not. |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
-- |
| 19 |
caveat utilitor |
| 20 |
♫ ❤ ♫ ❤ ♫ ❤ ♫ ❤ |
Archives