1 |
Marc Joliet wrote: |
2 |
> Am Mittwoch, 13. Dezember 2017, 12:04:03 CET schrieb Neil Bothwick: |
3 |
>> On Wed, 13 Dec 2017 10:06:29 +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote: |
4 |
>>> Some historical correctnesses about Canek: |
5 |
>>> |
6 |
>>> - He has been here for years |
7 |
>>> - He has contributed here for years |
8 |
>>> - He supports systemd and has offered more help and explanation about |
9 |
>>> systemd to it's users on this list than any other single person, bar |
10 |
>>> none |
11 |
>>> - He has never, not once, slagged off SysV Init, OpenRC or any other |
12 |
>>> init system, ot the creators or the users |
13 |
>>> - He has never posted rude or inflamatory comments about anyone arguing |
14 |
>>> against him |
15 |
>>> - He has never resorted to ad-hominem and never posted any knee jerk |
16 |
>>> opinions about any other poster wrt their stance on init systems |
17 |
>>> |
18 |
>>> If we look at the reverse we see a very different picture, and it's |
19 |
>>> right here in this very thread. To the poster who rudely commented about |
20 |
>>> Canek being a professor and that doesn't make him right and that he is |
21 |
>>> one voice, step back pal and take a very long hard look at what you |
22 |
>>> said. Yes, it doesn't make him right. Also doesn't make him wrong. His |
23 |
>>> posts and the content are what make him right or wrong. There truly are |
24 |
>>> fan bois on this list, but Canek is not one of them. It's the |
25 |
>>> systemd-haters and Poeterring-haters who are being fan bois, painting |
26 |
>>> all detractors with the same brush. |
27 |
>> +1 |
28 |
>> |
29 |
>> It was Canek's rational explanations about systemd that made me |
30 |
>> interested enough to try it, and I'm glad I did. He made good technical |
31 |
>> arguments in favour of it whereas most of the arguments against it are |
32 |
>> either based on Lennartphobia or false fact gained from other systemd |
33 |
>> haters. |
34 |
> +1 to both Alan and Neil. |
35 |
> |
36 |
>> I also see the position as somewhat different with Gentoo, because openrc |
37 |
>> is so much better than the other "traditional" systems out there, in fact |
38 |
>> it shares some of the benefits of systemd. As a result, I run a mixture |
39 |
>> of both systems. I prefer systemd now, but not enough to go through the |
40 |
>> hassle of switching over an already working system. That wouldn't be the |
41 |
>> case if those other systems weren't running openrc. |
42 |
> That echoes my own sentiment pretty well. OpenRC is one reason I stayed with |
43 |
> Gentoo, because it seemed better to me than the way other distros did things |
44 |
> (well, better than Suse, at least, which was the other distro I tried way back |
45 |
> then). |
46 |
> |
47 |
> However, now I default to systemd, because for me it's even better than |
48 |
> OpenRC. Plus, I don't have so many systems that I couldn't migrate them all |
49 |
> :-) . |
50 |
> |
51 |
|
52 |
|
53 |
And yet Canek is the only person on this mailing list to EVER get on my |
54 |
blacklist for his posts. That was years ago. To this day, I don't get |
55 |
any of his messages or read anything quoted from him. Even the troll |
56 |
who had his own script, kept griping about Gentoo and its update process |
57 |
and refused to listen to anyone didn't make it to the blacklist level. |
58 |
Eventually, some comrel member or something booted them off the list. |
59 |
|
60 |
I have to say, -1 for me. He managed to join a extremely exclusive club |
61 |
with me. He sits on a blacklist that no one else ever managed to get on. |
62 |
|
63 |
Dale |
64 |
|
65 |
:-) :-) |