1 |
On Wed, Jul 11, 2012 at 12:17 PM, Alex Schuster <wonko@×××××××××.org> wrote: |
2 |
>> How would you do that? I'm currently using ~amd64 and can't yet use |
3 |
>> sets for some reason. |
4 |
> |
5 |
> Then you probably need portage 2.2 for this. Which will never ever become |
6 |
> stable it seems, but I'm using it just fine for three years now. |
7 |
|
8 |
Yes, 2.2 is needed. And same here. Using it forever and no issues |
9 |
|
10 |
> |
11 |
> Is emerge @preserved-rebuild (with FEATURES=preserve-libs) also a 2.2 |
12 |
> feature? I like this most, I no longer need to use revdep-rebuild. I |
13 |
> always considered having to use it a bug, fixing broken things after |
14 |
> breaking them, instead of preventing breakage. |
15 |
|
16 |
Indeed, also a 2.2 thing and the biggest reason I use it honestly |
17 |
|
18 |
-- |
19 |
Douglas J Hunley (doug.hunley@×××××.com) |
20 |
Twitter: @hunleyd Web: |
21 |
douglasjhunley.com |
22 |
G+: http://goo.gl/sajR3 |